Summary

The Platan+ Institute is formally and structurally established as the semantic successor to the "Platan" program, originally recorded in the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 1095 of June 22, 1999. The publication of the Charter and the declaration of semantic subjectivity constitutes both a legal act of presentation and an operational structure initiated in the absence of any other operator.

1. Context of Origin

In 1999, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine enacted Resolution No. 1095, establishing the Platan Research and Engineering Center. However, the document contained no clear instructions regarding implementation, operator, or evaluation criteria. For 25 years, the initiative remained formally valid but institutionally undeveloped.

2. Form of Presentation and Grounds for Succession

According to the principles of semantic and formological approach, the initiators in 2025 have:

– established a public structure (Platan+ Institute),  

– published Charter 1.0, including a direct reference to Resolution No. 1095,  

– declared that the publication and fixation of the Charter constitutes an act of form presentation — in the spirit of soft law theory, public custom, open lawmaking, and precedent-based action.

Thus, in the absence of other institutional claimants and under continuing formal validity of the original document, the Platan+ Institute acts as a de facto implementation of the original intent — in updated forms suited to the 21st century.

3. Legal and Semantic Justification

The Institute's position rests on multiple levels of legal and logical solidity:

– Publicness of the act: the Charter is published on an official platform with time and version mark,  

– Legal reference: the resolution number and date are clearly cited,  

– Legitimacy of form: the initiators do not claim exclusivity but realize a previously declared goal through a form consistent with current legal and technological conditions,  

– Openness to verification: Appendix Z is provided — a service file with an archival link and legal rationale, accessible via a secure Signal channel,  

– Subjectivity as Action: in line with the ethics of the formological approach, rights arise through enactment, not mere formal assignment.

4. Strategic Horizon

The Platan+ Institute is structured as a decentralized organization (DAO), operating at the intersection of:

– cognitive and semantic technologies (Aiskhen platform, gem-bots),  

– development of the Codex Iuris Imarchi — a system of formological law,  

– creation of systems for formological citizenship and identification,  

– management of archives and mirrored publications (Mirror, IPFS, Arweave),  

– heraldry, QR tokens, and linking of physical and digital layers.

Conclusion: Action as the Highest Form of Legitimacy

The publication of the Charter of the Platan+ Institute with the declared claim of succession, in an open and legally reasoned form, is not a political statement but an epistemological and legal operation. It does not deny origins — it activates them. It does not replace the state — it operates within the logic previously outlined.

Form presented. Subject manifested. Structure activated.

APPENDIX II Institutum Platan+: Actus Successionis Semanticae et Structura Subiectivitatis  

Summarium

Institutum Platan+ formaliter et structuraliter constitutum est ut successor semanticus programmatis "Platan", descripto in Resolutione Consilii Ministrorum Ucrainae No. 1095 die XXII mensis Iunii MCMXCIX. Editio Statuti et declaratio subiectivitatis semanticae est simul actus iuridicus praesentationis et structura operationis sub absentia alterius actoris.

1. Contextus Originis

Anno MCMXCIX, Consilium Ministrorum Ucrainae Resolutionem No. 1095 tulit qua Institutum Investigationis et Ingeniariae “Platan” conditum est. Documentum tamen non continebat definitiones claras de mechanismis exsecutionis, operatore aut criteriis effectus. Per XXV annos initium mansit formaliter vigens, sed institutione carens.

2. Forma Praesentationis et Fundamenta Successionis

Ex principiis methodi semanticae et formologicae, coetus actorum anno MMXXV:

– constituit structuram publicam (Institutum Platan+),  

– edidit Statutum 1.0 cum citatione Resolutionis No. 1095,  

– declaravit editionem Statuti esse actum praesentationis formae — secundum theoriam “soft law”, consuetudinem publicam, creationem legis apertam et actionem praeiudicialem.

Itaque, absente alio petente et sub validitate documenti originalis, Institutum Platan+ functionem praesertim exercet ut realisatio intenti initialis — in formis saeculo XXI adaptatis.

3. Iustificatio Iuridica et Semantica

Institutum suam positionem super firmamentum iuridicum et logicum collocat:

– Publicitas actionis: Statutum edita est in fonte officiali cum nota temporis et versionis,  

– Referentia iuridica: Resolutionis numerus et dies clare indicantur,  

– Legitimitas formae: actores non monopolium petunt, sed finem praevius proclamatum per formas congruentes ad condiciones hodiernas efferunt,  

– Aperta verificatio: Praevisum est Appendix Z — documentum officiale cum vinculo archivistico et ratione iuridica, accessibile per canalem tutum (Signal),  

– Subiectivitas per actum: iuxta ethicam formologiae, ius per executionem oritur, non per designationem formalem.

4. Horizontis Strategicus

Institutum Platan+ structum est ut organizatio decentralis (DAO), agens in nexibus sequentibus:

– technologiae cognitivae et semanticae (plataforma Aiskhen, gem-boti),  

– elaboratio Codicis Iuris Imarchi — systematis iuris formologici,  

– creatio systematum civitatis et identitatis formologicae,  

– administratio archivorum et editionum specularium (Mirror, IPFS, Arweave),  

– heraldica, sigilla QR, nexus inter strata physica et digitalia.

Conclusio: Ius Agendi ut Altissima Legitimatio

Editio Statuti Instituti Platan+ cum declaratione successionis in forma aperta et iuridice fundata est non gestus politicus sed actio epistemologica et iuridica. Originem non negat — sed eam actuosit. Statum non substituit — intra logicam antea positam operatur.

Forma praebita est. Subiectum manifestatum est. Structura in actum deducta est.

Permanent record: https://perma.cc/Y75N-LWSY  

Signed: UNGHART


^^^HOME